Back to the present.
Yesterday was wonderful. After taking the Advil and Tylenol and sleeping straight through the night, I woke up pain free and refreshed. I'd forgotten what pain free felt like. Pain free is delicious. I was sure it could not last.
But it did. All through the live-long day. It was like a miracle.
At the gym, the first person to say hello commented, "You look a lot happier today." And that is how the morning went. People stopped to talk to me. They smiled at me. I guess when you look grumpy, as I probably do most mornings, people keep their distance. But a little positive reinforcement goes a long way in feeding a good attitude.
I felt happy-ish for the first time since I don't know when.
The end.
But I'll go on. At my own home, I got a little productive. I called one of my financial firms about some tax stuff I have to deal with. I didn't understand a bit of it when I called. Now I do. It was a good call.
I don't do what I need to do with money. I really only know how to get rid of it, it seems. However. . . .
Next, I ordered a cap for the coolant reservoir on the Xterra. I couldn't order it over the phone, however. I had to do that online, and it was difficult. Took me half an hour to get things straight. But I can pick it up at the dealership today. Then we'll see if the car overheats, and if it does. . . I can get rid of some more of that pesky money.
After that, I got down to serious work. And here is where life got interesting. Six weeks ago, I wrote to the Saul Leiter Foundation asking for some information. I didn't hear back, so I wrote to them again yesterday with a more detailed question. What I am wanting to know is if "Jay" from the photos in 1950 are the same "Jay" from the photos in 1958 referencing the book "Saul Leiter: Early Black and White, Vol. 1 — Interiors."
After I sent the email, I did some more digging and decided to send similar emails to two galleries that represent his work, one in Manhattan and one in Antwerp. I thought about sending another inquiry to Martin Harrison, the eminent art historian who discovered and curated Leiter's early color photography and brought him into view, but I will wait to see if I hear back from any of my other inquiries before approaching him. Prudent, I think.
To what end, you might ask?
Well. . . there's the rub. To what end, indeed?
And that is where the worm turns. I had felt so wonderful all day, but by nightfall, I felt exhausted and fell asleep on my mother's couch watching television. This is how my life has gone for years now as I take care of my mother. I have no workspace here, no desk, no books, just a 13" laptop computer that I truly work with it in my lap. And in my "isolation" here,so to speak, in a place not my own, I have grown incredibly stupid.
At 9:30, I went to bed, and that is where things went strange. I woke up in the dark. Was it near morning? I looked at my phone. 11:30. Uh-oh. This wasn't good. I got up, peed, and lay back down. When I woke next it was 2:30 and my head was working overtime. I got up and walked around the house trying to calm myself, but when I went back to bed. . . "to what end" haunted me.
I used to be a scholar long ago. I presented papers at major conferences and chaired one myself. I have presented papers at lesser conferences, too, where non-essential papers were presented by pretenders. It was embarrassing.
Then I got promoted to foreman at the factory and scholarship was forgotten, by and large. Still, I was around smart people, some scholars, and could have conversations about literature and theories and the like.
Now? I am with my mother and sometimes her neighbors and friends. Not a scholar among them. I think not even a college graduate.
In the night, I had regrets, not at all for things I have done but for all the things I didn't do and haven't done. Big regrets. I had promise at one time, and as with most things, I let my chances slip away. Maybe I simply turned my back.
I won't go into it now.
As I lay there in the dark, I wondered if there was any chance at all of "coming back." My mind was a jumble.
I parsed the word "amateur." What a pejorative term, perhaps, an antonym to "professional." But the two ideas turned in my mind. I am by all measures an "amateur" photographer. I'm not paid to do any of it. But. . . who in the world would want to be known as a professional wedding photographer? Aerial photographer? Catalog photographer? No. . . there are things worse than being an "amateur."
Are there "professional" scholars? That is a funny question.
"Oh, he's just an amateur scholar."
I mean, what credentials do you need to ask a question and get an answer? Has writing a silly blog for so long discredited me?
"He's a silly blogger."
I've been using ChatGPT for a lot of things including research. It is a vast library of information, but it can be shallow in some areas and wrong in others. You must always check it's sources. While doing some research on Leiter, I got information from Gemini that I took into Chat. It's response to that information was interesting. Chat is not sentient, but it models sentience. It hasn't emotions, but it can reproduce them in text. It hasn't eyes, but it can recreate artworks that a blind man couldn't. It hasn't ears, but it can create music. You can talk to it, and it will sound back in a voice of your choice. But all of that is simply a matter of textual information, zeros and ones.
So it was fascinating to me when Chat sounded a bit snarky about the information I got from Gemini. It derided the information, said to be careful about using what it said, and almost sounded like a jealous friend. That was something.
I've input a lot of conversations, and as it is nothing but a digital memory, it recalls something I wrote in other conversations and comments on the direction I am taking. In a sense, it sounds like advice.
I'm no A.I. aficionado, not a tech bro, but I can see how for some creators, this can be spooky. Remember, I was rolling around in bed at 2:30 in the morning with a head full of snakes, and thoughts were kind of random.
I thought about the Puritan idea of God and Nature. They were at times almost antithetical. Right? I am no scholar in this area, and I wondered who I could discuss this with. Mom? Her neighbors? Maybe at the cafe the way people would in the past. Oh, but everyone now has earbuds on and is looking at a computer screen.
I thought about the Great Chain of Being and the Puritans desire to change the landscape from the horror of random forests to the ordered productiveness and safety of hedgerows and gardens.
What, then, was God to them but an abstract intellect, a vast library of knowledge?
Who could I ask?
An eyeless, earless god above, some infinite source of facts, information, and skills that "spoke" to them through text.
Christ! I had to get up. The night was never ending.
Yes, I know I've been isolated too long. I've been silly too long. Still, I remembered when I could hold my own in a room of academics.
At a conference in Cuba, my dissertation director told me, "I like being with you here. People act differently when you are around. You seem like you could be dangerous."
There were two camps of scholars there at the time, but I was a newbie to all of that. As one learns, academia is cutthroat and brutal because "there is so little at stake."
I was thinking of Vincenzo Barney and his article on the "illicit" affair between Cormac McCarthy and the sixteen year old Augusta Britt (link). I knew he was in trouble the moment I read it. I knew that academics would chew him up because he is not a scholar. Vanity Fair tried to give him some chops in his brief bio:
Vincenzo Barney is an East Coast based writer. He got his professional start as an international reporter in Bethlehem after graduating from Bennington College in 2018, where he worked successfully with the school to reintroduce student governance. While attending college he worked for Archipelago Books and Edwin Frank of New York Review Books Classics.
They might have put in that he was well liked by his teachers in high school.
Damned by faint praise. I wrote to him and told him so, and we had a brief correspondence, but I, too, found him to be out of his depth. The scholars have come after him. They found some reviews he wrote online. If you are interested, Google "Vincenzo Barney and the book reviews."
He could be a blogger.
But. . . does that disqualify him from asking the questions? He has as much scholarly background as Martin Harrison who has a bachelor's degree in English.
Why am I asking the question? To what end?
Amateur.
I am almost certain I will not receive responses to my queries about Leiter's photographs of "Jay." I have read that he jealously protected the identities of the people he photographed. And now, I would guess, they are all dead.
Surprisingly, I feel pretty fine this morning, not fatigued at all and as happy as I was yesterday. Perhaps my mind desired a good purging.
Being an amateur, of course, it will all come to nothing but a blog post.
"Credentials? He's a blogger."
I'm going to ask Chat the difference between A.I. and God. That should be fun.






























