Monday, February 17, 2020

Dismantling



Living alone without a job, I have few distractions from my emotional state.  States, actually.  I realize that most of the time, I am good.  I wake in the night thinking, "I love my life."  Later, culling books, deciding what to keep and what to discard, something more complex emerges.  Then, eating lunch alone in a bar, there is a precipitous drop.  Confusion and paralysis become part of the late afternoon realizing how little was accomplished that day, then a numbness at dinner with my mother and cousin.  Late, with a whiskey, there is the inexplicable weeping over a sappy scene in an overproduced popular movie.  Then blankness and bed.

Each morning begins with a promise that the day eventually erodes.  Luckily, I have few moral regrets with which to contend.

But there are many practical ones.

So. . . yea.  Yesterday I decided to do something/anything practical and useful.  The list of things needing to be done is growing.  It has, in truth, becoming overwhelming, piling up like an Empire State Building, getting too large to even think of tackling.  It is beginning to effect my emotional wellbeing.

Yesterday, with weak determination, I decided to tackle the whole book fiasco.  I opened a tub of books I brought home from the factory, then turned my attention to my shelves.  There was no place to put the books in the tub.  Decisions would have to be made.  I wish it could be done in the passive voice, but it couldn't.  I had to make editorial decisions.  What to keep.  What to pitch.

And so, shelf by shelf, starting with the "A"s.  Jesus, I have a lot of books by Edward Abbey.  How'd I get so many?  Well. . . it was the '70s.  Then the '80s.

I kept them all.

Achube.  Hmm.  Gone.  Brautigan.  Look at all of those.  You know, I read them, but I was never a fan.  I will never read one of those again.  But man, they look good on the bookshelf.  I mean, c'mon. Fuck.  Something has to go.

Gone.

Two full shelves of Bukowski.  Really?  Sure.  I've been buying him since '74.  I have ridiculous small press, smaller press, almost mimeographed things.

Keep them all.

But what, then?

Crumley.  Holy shit.  I must have bought everything he ever published.  Why?  Oh, sure, he was a friend of the Clark Press crowd, a Montana writer, Harrison, McGuane, and the Gerber fortune.  The Clark City Press book is nice looking.  But fuck.

Gone.  All of them.

Etc.

I got through about half the bookshelves.  When I had finished, I was sneezing and blowing my nose with vengeance, eyes red and itchy.

And it didn't look as if I had made much headway.

I discarded piles of books that I had never read and would never read, many touted by the N.Y. Times as one of the best of the year.  I'll bet they would have been fun at the time, but they surely haven't held up.  They were not meant to last.

Still, it is heartbreaking to tear apart your youthful treasure chest, the fortunes of your years.  I must have spent all my money on books, what little I had, anyway.  It made me smarter and hipper than thou, I thought.  I valued them the way the young republicans valued their stock portfolios.

I look around wondering who was right.

I didn't touch Hemingway, Faulkner, Fitzgerald, or any of the other gold standards, of course.  Not even a little.

That's a lot of male authors, right?  I thought about going back and editing in the female authors from my shelves into the previous paragraphs just to make me historically acceptable, but I decided not to be one of those people.  I do have female authors.  Lots of them.

But not as many.  I read a lot of "tender hearted men, lonesome, sad, and blue" books.

And a lot of travel books from the past.  Adventure tales, of a sort.  Men braving the unknown.  I was looking for guidebooks, I guess.  I acted out most of what I read, though I never shot an animal.  But the rest of it.  You know--Burton and Speke, searching for the source of the Nile kind of stuff.  Victorian bravery, "The Man Who Would Be King" style.  Then the Lost Generation debilitated by war, living their stoic existential existences.  Then those fucked up Beats.

There are lots of books of Japanese and Chinese poetry.  And Yeats and Williams and Frost.  And of course Stevens and Elliot.

I can throw away the Pound.

But I haven't gotten to any of that yet.

My living room floor is littered with piles of books about which I am still undecided.  I have made more of a mess than I have solved.  I feel as if I have put on the wizard's hat in "Fantasia" and everything keeps multiplying.

Help!

More shelves today.  More blowing my nose and sneezing.

Oh. . . I forgot to mention one of the pleasures of going through old books.  I used everything and anything for a bookmark, and so opening the books, I find forgotten pleasures, old love notes, invitations, business cards, photographs. . . . There is a secret history hidden between the printed pages.  Some of it is funny.  Some of it is heartbreaking.  There will be more of that today.

And little else, really.  Dawn is cloudy and drizzling.  More dismantling, more organizing, and little else to distract me.

5 comments:


  1. What Pound will you be throwing out? I probably have them but curious.

    Who throws out Pound?

    "What tho lovest well remains, the rest is dross." That's my signature line.

    I have always been suspicious of people with no books in their home. You can tell much about a person by their book collection.

    I have done quite enough homes with shelves full of "Republican Reading" - you know the O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Coulter, Regan, McCain. Ugh. They all were slick slim books with the "authors" photo smiling on the front.



    Here's some more costarastrology:

    MORE

    Libra: Hedonistic than a Taurus

    Scorpio: Ambitious than a Capricorn

    Aquarius: Idealistic than a Libra


    ON A QUEST FOR

    Libra: Beauty

    Scorpio: The happiness they once felt as a child

    Aquarius: Acceptance

    Your Conversation Heart:

    Aquarius

    Your heart is buried beneath 10 different layers of irony but you still don't feel safe.


    I just picked Scorpio to add in case there are any floating by. I don't know what Q's sign is or I'd include his too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I took a grad course in Pound. I found him hideous. He was a true hater, that boy. I'm an idealistic dreamer? Hmm. Could be.

      Delete


  2. To each his own interpretation of Pound. but f course.

    I never took a grad course in Ole Ez but took it upon myself to make an intense study of his life & work - some 10 years of it. Trying to out Pound the Poet, of course, but leading me to understand and accept his intense passion and impression on and for art/poetry that must not be ignored because he was a lout and sometime Fascist.

    I find almost no other non-Asian interpreter of Chinese/Japanese poetry (of that time) as good as his. I do like Rexroth but Waley's work is as dry as a used up va-jj.

    His being kept in a cage and all -- well. He survived. His adoration of Fascism is only part of the man. And it is good to struggle - I think - with Pound's influence on the entire Modernist movement (and beyond) weighed with those years of his life - overall. I'm sure you had some of these same debates about that in your class.

    We always tried to get to the answer - is it the Man or his Art (or his dedication to art) that we should be judging? And judging - what a bad word itself. Especially in art!

    He helped Eliot make the Wasteland.

    “A miracle of ebulliency, gusto, and help,” Joyce called him. It’s true that he was flamboyant, immodest, opinionated, tactless, a pinwheel of affectation; he made people crazy and he became crazy himself.

    Gertrude Stein’s description of him is frequently invoked: “A village explainer, excellent if you were a village, but if you were not, not.”

    In his devotion to the modernist avant-garde, though, he was selfless. “A bombastic galleon, palpably bound to, or from, the Spanish Main,” Wyndham Lewis wrote about meeting Pound. “Going on board, I discovered beneath its skull and cross-bones, intertwined with fleurs de lys and spattered with preposterous starspangled oddities, a heart of gold.”

    His “Hugh Selwyn Mauberley" is deliciously satirical. I can recite his "River Merchant's Wife: A Letter" -and "Jewel Stair's Grievance" without reading from a book.

    A giant, maybe crazy man who had opinions - expressed them - paid for his foolish turn to hate with three weeks in an outdoor cage and 12 more years in an institution (perhaps rescued by people he knew truthfully) to avoid charges of treason.

    At least don't throw out "Cathay."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sure, Pound helped Elliot with Waste Land. There you go! Stein is to fiction what Pound is to poetry. You figure that one out. I'm not saying he didn't have intellect and passion. His were just not mine. But don't worry. I pick the wrong horse a lot. I liked Carol King more than Joni Mitchell at first. I came around, but that is a shameful admission. Linda Ronstadt, too. Well, fuck me. I often come around, though.

    ReplyDelete

  4. There was no attempting to persuade your opinion. Simply peacocking I suppose. I didn't like Picasso till I spent 2 years reading every single thing possible about him - and still what an asshole to women but fascinating guy.

    No it is not - all three of those women are delicious creatures of magic. I know - too old to think about in any way for you. But also too, Emmy Lou Harris. Swoon.

    Also. Funnily - I have recently started Gertrude Stein's "Three Lives." I picked it up at the thrift a few weeks ago.

    On Painting Gertrude Stein

    a blessed beast a cow a sow
    a slouching silhouette a bitch
    a tramp a bitter disease a whore
    red too red and all too easy
    way she lies
    I cannot paint today
    this line is wrong
    and that leads off to infinity
    and only heralds harm,
    maybe tomorrow the light will be better
    and her memory not so fresh and warm.
    A bit of bread and wine
    the stench of her admirers
    has put me off a bit,
    the heavy tread of step upon her creaky stair
    annoys me. Those other daring fellows, the ones with flowing hair,
    they do not understand the shadows, do not look inside the chair
    they cannot see the form within or do not care
    they cannot feel the painted trollop or walk within the stare
    the mud is wrong the chair is keening like a trumpets blare
    the curtains glare. her makeup is too fair.
    A bit of bread and wine
    the stench of her admirers
    has put me off a bit,
    I cannot paint today.

    ReplyDelete