What a day I had, but first. . . what is an Asian, anyway?
The Census Bureau defines a person of the Asian race as “having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.”Whoa! That's a whole lot of people. In my experience, they don't see themselves a single entity, though. Filipinos, for instance, aren't high on the Vietnamese. And you know what the Japanese think of the Chinese. What is it they call them?
Most people, however, refer only to East Asians as Asians. And they are a very diverse group.
East Asians is a term used for ethnic groups that are indigenous to East Asia, which consists of China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Japan, Mongolia, North Korea, and South Korea. The major ethnic groups that form the core of East Asia are the Han, Joseon, and Yamato.Every time I hear or read the use of the word "Asian" in the press, I wonder how long it will be before they make any distinction. We love to group people, but it really isn't so very effective in understanding them.
When the phrase Asian American was created — in 1968, according to activists and academics — it was a radical label of self-determination that indicated a political agenda of equality, anti-racism and anti-imperialism. Asian American was an identity that was chosen, not one that was given.
Over the last 50 years, however, as people of Asian ancestry in the United States have grown in number and diversity, the term has evolved — raising new questions of who is included in Asian America, what it stands for and if it’s still relevant.
“If you were to ask most people who are Asian American, ‘Describe your race or ethnicity,’ they would say, ‘I’m Japanese American,’ ‘I’m Thai, Cambodian, Filipino.’ Very few of us would start out by saying, ‘I’m Asian American,’” Daryl Maeda, a professor of Asian-American studies at the University of Colorado, Boulder and author of the book, “Rethinking the Asian American Movement,” said (link).
As usual, I am over my head here and should stop. But it seems to me, using the term "Asian" is worse than saying someone is "African" as it hinders thinking about true diversity. The press has me thinking that most Asians work in massage parlors. And we know that's not true. They work in laundries, too, right?
O.K. I always have to be a smart ass. Apologies to the Woke.
I'm thinking about deleting all of this, and starting over and telling you about my day, but I think I'll save yesterday for tomorrow unless something happens to me today which will lead me to a dilemma of riches. Truly, nothing spectacular happened yesterday other than I had a few conversations, something that hasn't happened much in the past year. No, nothing really happened at all.
Ah you have come upon a sticky wicket, as when those Asian bastards from India beat the Anglo team from jolly old England. Ask a Haitian what she thinks about being called an African/American. Cubans consider themselves racially superior to all other Latinx ethnicities. You do not even want to get into the fratricidal animosities between tribal groups amongst our Native American brethren where outright wars break out between clans within a particular tribe. People become more and more tribal (and despicable) the more closely they are closely examined – ask the fecking Irish – or amongst our people – the Hatfields and McCoys.
ReplyDeleteAbout the Asians though. I have a particular affinity for that group and consider myself an expert. After all I do eat sushi, dip in onsen, frequent massage parlors, and have been to Japan – twice!
I am a latter day James A. FitzPatrick with a “Voice of the Globe:
“Behold the shapely native girl in her native dress and her deep almond eyes. She sways sensuously in a haze of opium smoke to the enticing music of a bamboo flute beckoning the weary traveler to a sweet repose. And with that, I bid you a fond adieu from the Isle where romance is not a forgotten dream of modernity.”
ReplyDeleteYou've should have gone to meet her - that Girl up there.
I've been reading my lovers work. He's dead, ya know.
And, yet there he is.
This is from the Bumps River Girl Collection.
Canto
round the coal stove
on a Saturday night
Spring a naughty child
Lisa said I shouldn't go
but I told her
it will all turn out
when everyone knows
about my report
tom said,
In every free and deliberating society, there must, from the nature of man, be opposite parties, and violent dissensions and discords; and one of these, for the most part, must prevail over the other for a longer or shorter time."
John says whoa:
We ought to consider what is the end of government, before we determine which is the best form. Upon this point all speculative politicians will agree, that the happiness of society is the end of government, as all Divines and moral Philosophers will agree that the happiness of the individual is the end of man. From this principle it will follow, that the form of government which communicates ease, comfort, security, or, in one word, happiness, to the greatest number of persons, and in the greatest degree, is the best.
Abuse of words has been the great instrument of sophistry and chicanery, of party, faction, and division of society.
Tom insists,
"Men by their constitutions are naturally divided into two parties: 1. Those who fear and distrust the people, and wish to draw all powers from them into the hands of the higher classes. 2. Those who identify themselves with the people, have confidence in them, cherish and consider them as the most honest and safe, although not the most wise depositary of the public interests. In every country these two parties exist, and in every one where they are free to think, speak, and write, they will declare themselves. Call them, therefore, Liberals and Serviles, Jacobins and Ultras, Whigs and Tories, Republicans and Federalists, Aristocrats and Democrats, or by whatever name you please, they are the same parties still and pursue the same object. The last one of Aristocrats and Democrats is the true one expressing the essence of all."
"Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object: the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers, the other by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove. We think that one side of this experiment has been long enough tried and proved not to promote the good of the many, and that the other has not been fairly and sufficiently tried. Our opponents think the reverse. With whichever opinion the body of the nation concurs, that must prevail."
Part of it in a letter to Abigail, who oft reminded him of those without rights...
ReplyDeleteWhitman, dead as the rest, just now
rather ghostly they appear
round that coal stove,
Lisa says
And your very flesh shall be a great poem.
Keep your face always toward the sunshine - and shadows will fall behind you.
Re-examine all that you have been told... dismiss that which insults your soul.
the charming mr. Jefferson, never just tom
"I consider the party division of Whig and Tory the most wholesome which can exist in any government, and well worthy of being nourished, to keep out those of a more dangerous character."
(tea parties are for little girls with imaginary friends
Someone snipes)
John shouts!
A government of laws, and not of men.
The law no passion can disturb. 'Tis void of desire and fear, lust and anger. 'Tis mens sine affectu, written reason, retaining some measure of the divine perfection. It does not enjoin that which pleases a weak, frail man, but, without any regard to persons, commands that which is good and punishes evil in all, whether rich or poor, high or low.
(JOHN ADAMS, Argument in Defense of the British Soldiers in the Boston Massacre Trials, Dec. 4, 1770) He boasts
reflectively he added,
Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
As to the history of the revolution, my ideas may be peculiar, perhaps singular. What do we mean by the Revolution? The war? That was no part of the revolution; it was only an effect and consequence of it. The revolution was in the minds of the people, and this was effected... before a drop of blood was shed.
ralph concluded,
Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail. Once you make a decision, the universe conspires to make it happen.
at that, Lisa claps her hand & laughs
since we was sure of it
all the while
ReplyDeleteIf I posted it before - my apologies. It just struck me - reading it again.
ReplyDeleteHere's one that fits.
Written long before there was an Us. I think this was from 1995 or so.
Lovers Anonymous,
Perhaps I should join
and spill my story on the crowd.
You know the one,
the one about how
I love this girl
but she loves me not,
how she's way too young,
and much too fast.
how the party swirls around
above my head,
making me dizzy.
about how
I can't even look at her
for fear of finally knowing her,
too much.
yeh, that story.
We lived in a dreamscape I've come to realize. I was his best moll - the partner in crime who could help him steal as much of life as there was to thieve.
Good Lord. I will stop. Some of them are just so good. And knowing him - makes the better, I suppose.
I gotta stop for today though. I've already wetted a box of kleenex.
I guess with the full moon today the veil is thin. Thanks for those last two polaroids...
ReplyDelete